Response
to “Just Give It to Me Straight: A Case Against Filtering the Internet,” in the May 2004 Phi Delta Kappan by Callister and Burbules. Appeared in Backtalk section, June 2004
Dear Sirs and Madams:
While I find little with which to disagree in the fine article “Just Give It to Me Straight: A Case Against Filtering the Internet,” May 2004 Kappan, Callister and Burbules ignore a sad reality: the horse is already out of the barn on the filtering issue for practically all public schools.
Most school districts were coerced into installing an Internet filter during the 2001 school year in order to comply with the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) guidelines, and so remain eligible for eRate and other federal funds.
The question then is not whether to have filters, but how to use them as wisely as possible to prevent many of the harms Callister and Burbules point out.
Internet filters have a wide range of restrictiveness. Depending on the product, the product’s settings, and the ability to override the filter to permit access to individual sites, filters can either block a high percentage of the Internet resources (specific websites, email, chat rooms, etc.) or a relatively small number of sites.
As proponents of intellectual freedom, educators should:
I believe schools can use a limited filtering system that keeps the little ones from accidentally accessing inappropriate or even dangerous websites, but still allows a generous degree of intellectual freedom.